Narratives of Value in Richard Brome’s Dispute with the Salisbury Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12745/et.23.2.3153Keywords:
Richard Brome, Richard Heton, Salisbury Court Playhouse, Caroline, Stewart, Stage HistoryAbstract
The bill and answer for the 1640 court of request proceedings constitute the extant evidence of the terms of two contracts between Richard Brome and the Salisbury Court, one signed in 1635 and the other drafted in 1638 but unsigned. Inferring from these documents key differences between the contracts, this essay argues that the first contract left crucial ambiguities about the value of Brome’s labour, and the company attempted to resolve these ambiguities to its advantage through the second contract and the bill of complaint. This evidence suggests a primarily antagonistic relationship between Brome and the Salisbury Court from 1636.
References
N. W. Bawcutt, ‘Documents of the Salisbury Court Theater in the British Library’, Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 9 (1997)
Mark R. Benbow, ‘Dutton and Goffe versus Broughton: A Disputed Contract for Plays in the 1570s’, Records of Early English Drama Newsletter 6.2 (1981)
Gerald Eades Bentley, The Profession of Dramatist in Shakespeare’s Time 1590-1642 (New Jersey, 1971)
Martin Butler, ‘Exeunt Fighting: Poets, Players, and Impresarios at the Caroline Hall Theaters’, Adam Zucker and Alan B. Farmer (eds), Localizing Caroline Drama Politics and Economics of the Early Modern English Stage (London, 2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230601611_5
Eleanor Collins, ‘Richard Brome’s Contract and the Relationship of Dramatist to Company in the Early Modern Period’, Early Theatre, 10 (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.12745/et.10.2.757
Eleanor Clare Collins, ‘Richard Brome and the Salisbury Court Contract’ Richard Brome Online (http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/brome, 15 February 2017)
W. W. Greg (ed), Henslowe Papers: Being Documents Supplementary to Henslowe’s Diary (London, 1907)
Ann Haaker, ‘The Plague, the Theater, and the Poet’, Renaissance Drama 1 (1968), http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/rd.1.41917417
Lamar M. Hill, ‘“Extreame Detriment”: Failed Credit and the Narration of Indebtedness in the Jacobean Court of Requests’, Buchanan Sharp and Mark Charles Fissel (eds), Law and Authority in Early Modern England: Essays Presented to Thomas Garden Barnes (Newark, 2007)
L[amar] M. Hill (ed), The Ancient State Authoritie and Proceedings of the Court of Requests by Sir Julius Caesar (Cambridge, 1975)
I. S. Sanders (ed), Select cases in the Court of Requests, A.D. 1497 - 1569 (London, 1898)
Matthew Steggle, Richard Brome: Place and Politics on the Caroline Stage (Manchester, 2004)
Tim Stretton (ed), Marital Litigation in the Court of Requests 1542-1642 (Cambridge, 2008)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Contributors to Early Theatre retain full copyright to their content. All published authors are required to grant a limited exclusive license to the journal. According to the terms of this license, authors agree that for one year following publication in Early Theatre, they will not publish their submission elsewhere in the same form, in any language, without the consent of the journal, and without acknowledgment of its initial publication in the journal thereafter.
